Search Results

ADOPTED PROJECT: Developing and testing a Patient Report Experience Measure for patients accessing Acute OnCology services: The PREMAC study Principal Investigator : Dr Richard Wagland, Senior Research Fellow, University of Southampton, School of Health Sciences Co-Investigators : Professor Alison Richardson, Professor of Cancer Nursing & End of Life Care and Director of NIHR ARC Wessex, University of Southampton & University Hospital Southampton John Defty, Advanced Clinical Practitioner in Cancer Care, University Hospital Southampton Dr Emma Brown, Medical Oncologist, Acute Oncology Lead. University Hospital Southampton Start date : January 2023 End Date: May 2024 Funder : University Hospitals Southampton (UHS) NHS Foundation Trust R&D Small Grants Award Lay summary People with cancer often need to access acute oncology (AO) services for serious problems caused by their disease or treatment. This study will co-design a questionnaire, involving patients, staff and researchers, to measure patient experience. Findings from surveys that use this questionnaire can inform service improvements. The research will produce a questionnaire and a protocol on how best to manage data collection processes and do the groundwork for a future grant application to distribute and test the questionnaire in services in Wessex and across England. Findings from exercises that use this questionnaire can establish and compare the quality of patient experience across services and inform improvements. Background Hospitals have established structured pathways for managing patients with oncological emergencies through acute oncology (AO) services. Whilst some Trusts have developed local questionnaires specific to that service there is no survey available to measure and compare patient experience across NHS trusts. This study will co-design a patient-reported experience measure (PREM), intended to be adaptable for use across different AO service models. Advisory Group Members : Andrew Dossett, Lead Clinical Advanced Clinical Practitioner for Acute Oncology Service, University Hospital Southampton Jane Winter, Macmillan Lead Nurse, Wessex Cancer Alliance Laura White, Head of Involvement & Participation, University Hospital Southampton Katie Hudson, Lead Advanced Clinical Practitioner for Cancer Care Wards, University Hospital Southampton Mrs Susan Restorick-Banks (PPI Representative) Mrs Anne Ongley (PPI Representative) Alison Keen, Head of Cancer Nursing, University Hospital Southampton Philippa Jones, Acute Oncology Nurse Advisor, Board Member of UK Acute Oncology Society. Prof. Ernie Marshall, Medical Oncologist, Wirral University Teaching Hospital (Clatterbridge) NHS England national lead for Acute Oncology

ADOPTED: Evaluation & Exploration of Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership Interventions Evaluation & Exploration of the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership (MASP) Team: Research Team based at University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine and ARC Wessex Partners who will collaborate on the research: Hampshire & Isle of Wight Office of the Police & Crime Commissioner, Hampshire & Isle of Wight Constabulary, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire & Isle of Wight Probation Service, & STOP Domestic Abuse. Start date: 1 April 2023 End date: 1 April 2025 Hampshire & Isle of Wight (HIOW) was one of the three pilot sites of the Multi-Agency Stalking Intervention Programme (MASIP), commissioned by the Home Office in 2018. The programme identified positive outcomes from the limited number of case consultations and direct interventions delivered. Funding for MASIP ceased in March 2023 and new funding was sought to refresh the initiative and realise its potential. With two years of funding from the Home Office, from April 2023-March 2025, the partnership has been renewed to address stalking in HIOW. Key partners include the Office of the Police & Crime Commissioner for HIOW, HIOW Constabulary, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, HIOW Probation, and STOP Domestic Abuse. This service, called the Multi-Agency Stalking Partnership (MASP), aims to deliver a package of interventions to reduce the impact of stalking. The objective of this partnership is to reduce the risk of further stalking behaviour, and improve the psychological wellbeing of the person using stalking behaviours, whilst keeping the safety of the survivor and their dependents at the centre of this work. The service aims to help up to 160 people who have used stalking behaviours, and their victims, per year. The package to be delivered by this partnership will include: The package to be delivered by this partnership will include: - Three novel models of rehabilitation, using Psychologist-Led Stalking Interventions (PLSI), for individuals who are using stalking behaviours - Advocacy and support for individuals who have been victims of stalking, and - Professional development, support resources, and new ways of working for professionals who are working with people who have stalked Our team at the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, has been asked to conduct an independent evaluation of the MASP’s activities. We will also conduct primary research to determine whether and how the interventions that MASP deliver are effective in reducing the risk of further stalking behaviour and improving the psychological wellbeing of the person who has stalked. We hope to be able to create new evidence, that can be shared with other agencies, about what works (and how and why) to reduce stalking behaviours. What are the aims? The objectives of the service evaluation and primary research are: 1. To determine whether the effectiveness of the MASP activities: have they been successful in reducing the risk of further stalking behaviour and improving the psychological wellbeing of the person who has used stalking behaviours? 2. To explore the mechanisms and outcomes of the MASP activities: how and why might they impact on the risk of further stalking behaviour? How will the study be carried out? We will analyse routinely-collected, anonymised, data from the MASP partners to determine the effectiveness of the MASP activities. We will also conduct data directly from MASP professionals, MASP clients, and SASS clients, via survey and interview, to explore further how and why the MASP activities might have any effects. What will happen to the findings? The findings will directly inform the future of stalking-related work in Hampshire & Isle of Wight, and elsewhere. We will share the results widely, through publication in peer-reviewed journals, reports to the funder, and presentations at local, national, and international conferences. Where can I get more information? Please contact MASPinfo@soton.ac.uk for more information. Service links: Southern Health Link to Police commissioner website

Subscribe for our newsletter

COMPLETED: Shift Pattern Feasibility Feasibility of collecting and using nursing shift patterns data in acute, community and mental health wards Principal Investigator: Dr Chiara Dall’Ora Team members: Dr Chiara Dall'Ora (Senior Research Fellow in Nursing Workforce, School of Health Sciences, University Of Southampton), Professor Peter Griffiths (Chair of Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton), Ms Nicky Sinden (Head of Nursing Workforce at Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust), Dr Sarah Williams (Associate Director of Research & Improvement, and Academy Lead at Solent NHS Trust), Ms Catherine Smith (Associate Director Workforce Research and Innovation, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust), Professor Jane Ball (Deputy Head of School (Research & Enterprise), School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton), Dr David Culliford (Senior Medical Statistician, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton), Mr Anthony Austin, PPI contributor Start: 1 October 2020 Ended: 31 December 2022 Partners: University of Southampton, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Solent NHS Trust, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust. UNISON, Royal College of Nursing Lay summary Nurses and care assistants form the largest group of NHS staff. Most work in services that provide care across 24 hours of the day. Research indicates that the organisation of nursing shift patterns might affect the productivity of health services. The introduction of long shifts in nursing was offered as a strategy to maintain service levels while eliminating overlaps. However, research has found that long shifts are associated with higher rates of sickness and poorer patient care. So far, there has been little research exploring individual factors influencing shift work experiences among nurses, and research has been largely confined to acute hospitals. What did we learn/find out? Working long shifts (12-h or longer) leads to more burnout for nursing staff Having little choice around shift patterns leads to more nursing burnout Nurses working 12-h shifts reported lower choice around shift patterns than nurses working 8-h shifts When wards in Mental Health and community hospitals operated with high proportions of long shifts, there were higher rates of patient incidents This was particularly the case for self-harm incidents and incidents of patient disruptive behaviour What difference can this new knowledge make? It will help nurse managers and those in charge of creating nursing rotas It will help nurses working in inpatient settings choose their shift patterns It will keep patients safer because they will be cared for by nurses who are less tired Why is this important for patients, health and care providers and policy makers ? Nursing burnout is at an all time high, and we provided evidence that can help alleviate burnout Improving patient safety is of paramount importance for any health organisation, and our findings support changes to work organisation to improve patient safety What we are going to be doing next? We will keep disseminating our findings by publishing further papers We are now co-developing feasible changes to shift patterns with nursing staff and their managers as part of our new project We have applied for further funding to maximise analysis of datasets we have created as part of this study Publications https://human-resources-health.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12960-022-00731-2 Shift work characteristics and burnout among nurses: cross-sectional survey | Occupational Medicine | Oxford Academic https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2023/6626585 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16974

The feasibility of community pharmacies testing for Hepatitis C in people who inject image and performance enhancing drugs Principal Investigators: Dr Ryan Buchanan Team members: Dr Ryan Buchanan (Academic Clinical Lecturer Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton), Professor Salim Khakoo (Professor of Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton), Dr Charlotte Cook (Hepatology Research Fellow, University Hospital Southampton), Dr Mark Wright (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust), Charlotte Matthews (Southampton City Council), Dr Gemma Ward (Public Health England) , Colin McAllister (Southampton City CCG), Stuart Smith ( Hepatitis C Trust ), Mark Wright (NHS England, Wessex Operational Delivery Network for Hepatitis C ), Pamela Campbell (Solent NHS Trust, Homeless Healthcare Team) Start: 1 December 2019 Ends: 1 January 2024 Project Partners : University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Solent NHS Trust, NHS England, Public Health England, Southampton City CCG, Southampton City Council, Hepatitis C Trust. Lay summary: The people at highest risk of Hepatitis C (HCV) in the United Kingdom (UK) are those who are sharing needles, syringes or injecting equipment. This includes people who inject performance and image enhancing drugs (PIEDs) such as steroids.This population are high users of needle and syringe programmes, however, the risks taken by this population and their access to testing for HCV are poorly understood. The information that is available is not consistent, with the proportion of people with HCV varying widely but may be as high as one in seven PIED users. The study has been discussed in detail with bodybuilders, a gym owner, pharmacists and people who work at needle and syringe programmes (NSPs). The bodybuilders were very keen to be involved in the study as they want to have accurate, scientifically performed studies. They feel strongly that the information that is out there currently is not representative of their community that use PIEDs. They also felt that it was important that to have a focus on HCV but they were keen to be involved in a study that also addresses at other elements of liver health. The methodology for the study were discussed and adapted after patient and public involvement (PPI) meetings.The aim of this study is to see if widening access to testing of HCV based in community pharmacies with a pathway into specialist care is able to provide improved and acceptable access to testing and treatment compared with standard care. We also want to gain a better understanding of the burden of HCV in this group of people who are using PIEDs, and an understanding of risk behaviours. We will also investigate knowledge of liver disease caused by other factors (e.g. alcohol and obesity). This will be done via interviews with bodybuilders to understand more about their behaviour and the risks they take. This will be followed by a survey with an associated HCV test and measurement of liver scarring. The information gained from the interviews, surveys and tests will give a far greater understanding of this population and their risk of HCV. This information can then be used to target at-risk groups and to adapt current approaches with the aim of elimination. The results will be disseminated in medical journals and presented at medical conferences. Publications doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13207 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13554 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riac064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-BASL.130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BASL.40 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13786 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(20)32040-7

ADOPTED PROJECT: Breast Cancer Choices: Evaluation and implementation of a digital patient-centred decision aid to support genetic testing in mainstream care. ADOPTED PROJECT: Breast Cancer Choices: Evaluation and implementation of a digital patient-centred decision aid to support genetic testing in mainstream care. Principal Investigator: Dr Katherine Morton, Senior Research Fellow Team: Dr Gillian Crawford, Consultant Genetic Counsellor, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Lucy Side, Consultant and Lead Clinician in Clinical Genetics, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Jackie Chandler, Evaluation Programme Manager (Qualitative), Wessex Academic Health Science Network, Dr Kate Lippiett, Senior Research Fellow, Wessex Cancer Alliance, Prof Diana Eccles, Dean of Medicine, Professor of Cancer Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Southampton, Prof Claire Foster, Professor of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Southampton, Mrs Lesley Turner, Patient and Public Involvement contributor, Ms Kelly Kohut, Consultant Genetic Counsellor, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Start date: 1 May 2022 End date: 1 May 2024 Background The demand for genetic testing for inherited cancer susceptibility is rising and services are increasingly being provided in mainstream care. In Wessex last year, more than 180 genetic tests were offered to cancer patients in mainstream care, and this will increase in 2022 as more genetic services become mainstreamed and eligibility criteria are expanded. This means that genetic testing is offered by clinicians such as oncologists, surgeons and cancer nurse specialists rather than Clinical Genetic services. It is part of a move to routinely offer genetic testing to all cancer patients where there may be clinical benefit. The results of genetic testing can improve health outcomes by informing optimal treatment pathways and facilitating cancer prevention or early detection in family members. However, deciding whether to have genetic testing is a complex, personal decision with potentially life-changing implications for the patient and family. Many people with cancer are faced with this decision shortly after diagnosis, at an already stressful time. Without the support of specialist genetic counsellors to discuss the medical, psychological and social consequences of genetic testing, it is essential that these patients are given accessible and appropriate support as a complement to clinical conversations. Mainstream clinicians feel they lack the necessary skills and time to support patients in this complex decision process. Web-based decision aids could offer an effective solution, giving patients the flexibility to reflect on and discuss information about genetic testing in their own time, in light of their own personal values. Breast Cancer Choices is one such web-based decision aid which was developed through a two-year research project funded by Breast Cancer Now involving extensive patient input and a review of evidence. By evaluating the implementation of Breast Cancer Choices in mainstream services, we would not only provide improved support to breast cancer patients currently undergoing this difficult process, but also identify wider-reaching implications regarding how best to support patients with other cancers in the national move towards genetic testing. As 1 in 2 people in the UK are expected to develop cancer in their lifetime, with 5-10% of these cancers estimated to be due to inherited predisposition, a clear implementation strategy for mainstream genetic testing is essential. Overall, the project aims to evaluate the impact of Breast Cancer Choices on patient’s decision making and clinician experiences in mainstream care, and to understand how web-based decision aids can be effectively implemented across mainstream cancer care.

ADOPTED PROJECT: Happier Feet ADOPTED PROJECT: Happier Feet Disrupting the vicious cycle of healthcare decline in Diabetic Foot Ulceration through active prevention: The future of self-managed care Chief Investigator: Dr Andrew Weightman – University of Manchester Project Team Members: Dr Katherine Bradbury – University of Southampton, Professor Helen Dawes – University of Exeter, Mr Andrew Eccles – University of Strathclyde, Dr Safak Dogan – Loughborough University, Dr Glen Cooper – University of Manchester, Professor Frank Bowling – University of Manchester, Dr Xiyu Shi, Loughborough University, Professor Ahmeet Kondoz– Loughborough University Organisations Involved: Diabetes UK Background: There is a significant unmet clinical need for an adaptable, acceptable and adoptable technology to identify and prevent diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) formation, to enable self-management and timely clinical intervention to improve outcomes and reduce the economic burden of healthcare provision. Our primary purpose is to develop and implement an adaptable, acceptable, and cost- effective smart sensing insole technology which can detect when a DFU is likely to occur and can adapt plantar tissue loading to prevent formation, thus enabling self-management. This project proposes to build and expand on current smart insole technologies for the detection of DFUs, utilising a sensor fusion approach for their identification. A smart insole with integrated pressure (normal, shear), temperature, gait (IMU) and mechanomyography (acoustic) sensors will identify early indicators of ulceration and when movement is appropriate/inappropriate. The smart insole will respond to these inputs and adjust the foot (and gait), through an array of artificial muscles, to support better (safe/ comfortable) movement. This project aims to co-develop this new smart sensing insole with people living with diabetic foot ulcers. We hope to establish: What patients think of the idea of a smart sensing insole for early detection of DFUs which includes the provision to adjust the foot to reduce pressure on areas of likely ulceration. A prototype insole and optimised this with patient feedback. Early safety testing of this device. Security protocols to enable secure storage and sharing of data from this insole (e.g., between patient and clinicians).

Pharmacological And Non-Pharmacological treatment of ADHD in Pre-schoolers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis: the PANPAP study Lead applicant: Professor Samuele Cortese Co-applicants: Andrea Cipriani, Corentin Gosling, Luis Farhat, Cinzia Del Giovane Background: Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) have problems with attention and need to move more than most children. About 5% of school-aged children and 2% of pre-schoolers have ADHD, respectively. This translates into almost 10,000 pre-schoolers with ADHD in the South West England area. Interventions for ADHD include pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. When not treated, ADHD entails a significant burden to society, estimated at more than £20,000 per year. Therefore, it is important to detect and treat ADHD in the early years to prevent the negative consequences of ADHD later in life. Experts and ADHD support groups agree that the NHS does not meet the needs of pre-schoolers with ADHD. Currently, there are either long waiting lists or no services for pre-schoolers with ADHD in the NHS. To provide the best care for pre-schoolers with ADHD, we need to make sure that the NHS offers treatments that work well and are safe. In 2018, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended mainly non-pharmacological interventions (behavioral interventions) for the treatment of pre-schoolers with ADHD. Back then, there was a paucity of studies on other non-pharamcological interventions and on medications for ADHD in pre-schoolers. Since 2018, there has been an increasing number of studies on other types of interventions (e.g., family-based interventions and diet) and on medications. There has also been an increasing trend in some countries (e.g., USA) to use medications for pre-schoolers with ADHD. Therefore, we need to understand which is the best intervention for pre-schoolers with ADHD. Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for ADHD in pre-schoolers. Methods: We will not do a new study, which would be very expensive. Rather, we will use a new type of research, called “network meta-analysis”. This approach uses data from available studies to compare different types of treatments even when they have not been compared directly in the individual available studies. Therefore, we will first systematically search for published and unpublished studies of any pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment for pre-schoolers with ADHD. We will then combine the information from these studies with a state-of-the-art statistical approach. We will finally assess the quality of the studies included in the analysis and the strength of the evidence that we will generate. We are well known experts in this type of research. The study will be conducted at the University of Southampton, in collaboration with international researchers, including a statistician with renowned expertise in this type of analysis. Impact: The findings of our research are expected to inform future regional, national and international guidelines on the treatment of ADHD in pre-schoolers. As such, our results will be disseminated to local commissioners and policy makers, NICE, and international guidelines groups such as the European ADHD Guidelines Group. We will also disseminate our findings to associations of families with children with ADHD in the Wessex area, at the national (for example, National Attention Deficit Disorder Information and Support Service, ADDISS), and international level (ADHD Europe).

< Back Realities of adult social care recruitment and retention World Social Work Day 2024 Professor Lee-Ann Fenge - lfenge@bournemouth.ac.uk Dr Andy Pulman – apulman@bournemouth.ac.uk Social Work Week is an opportunity to celebrate the value that social work brings to society as well as acknowledging the challenges the profession faces. The theme of World Social Work Day is ‘Buen Vivir: shared Future for Transformative Change’, calling for social workers to adopt innovative, community-led approaches that are grounded in indigenous wisdom and harmonious coexistence with nature. This is an important focus as we recover in a post-COVID world, where budgets continue to be constrained and social workers increasingly draw on their creativity and innovative practice to provide excellent support for those they work with. To transform practice, it is important that we build an evidence base of what works and why, developing social work and social care research that evidences the value of the approaches taken. To date social work has lacked an established culture of research within social care organisations, resulting in limited high-quality research evidence alongside a limited culture of staff development focused on research opportunities. Practitioners may wish to develop a practitioner-researcher focus to their work, but this is often not supported or developed by their employer. This results in a missed opportunity to develop ground-up inclusive research practice driven by the insights and priorities of practitioners and service users which is essential to underpin high quality care. Within the Wessex region, we have been working to support the development of social care research over the past few years. In 2022, we completed a year-long study examining social care research enablers and barriers which might prevent or limit a positive research environment for practitioners (Pulman and Fenge, 2023). This built the foundation for four projects across Wessex funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Wessex – which all aimed to build research partnerships across local authorities (LAs) and universities in the region. As part of these projects, separate funding was available to support research champions embedded within local authorities, to support activities such as lunch time research discussions, journal clubs and the development of practitioner focused research. To encourage buy-in from the LAs we developed research in partnership with them to respond to key priority areas. One such project explored local recruitment and retention issues in adult social care (ASC) from the perspective of four populations of interest collecting data from n=131 participants across the four populations of interest: ( POI 1 ) Social care practitioners - social workers, allied health professionals, unregistered and other social care practitioners - currently working in adult social care at two local authorities (LAs) ( POI 2 ) Social care staff with responsibility for performing exit interviews with LA staff currently working at the two LAs ( POI 3 ) Students currently enrolled in social work undergraduate and postgraduate programmes within the Wessex region ( POI 4 ) Service users with lived experience of receiving services in either LA and advocates drawn from Wessex Region LA contracted services Realities of retention So what does our data tell us about the day-to-day realities of people currently working within adult social care? What pressures are they currently experiencing and what might make them question whether they want to stay working within the profession? Within POI 1, n=97 practitioners working in adult social care at two local authorities completed our online survey on recruitment and retention with n=25 subsequently being interviewed. We found: Within next three years, n=17 (17.5%) were planning on leaving social care Career change decisions included changing area of practice, independent working, moving sectors to the NHS/Third Sector and leaving the profession to go to other employment – the biggest response at n=7 (41.2%) The most important reasons for those wanting to leave social care within the next three years were ranked by number of responses and the highest ranked themes were then corroborated within the data collected from all participants as being ongoing issues of concern for LAs. Below we reflect on a number of the challenges, pressures and demands on ASC at the moment. Demands of administrative tasks Participants described support posts being reduced, causing them to spend more time on administerial processes. Additionally, more time-consuming paperwork was required and constantly changing processes created ongoing frustration. Workload demand The increasing demands on roles in terms of a rising number of cases within LAs and subsequent increased caseloads caused immense pressure on being able to process work in a timely manner. Inadequate staffing levels Staffing levels in some teams was not deemed to be adequate. Inadequate pay and benefits Pay was often equated to a lack of value in the profession when compared to other health professionals. Pay was viewed frequently as being less than equivalent to what could be obtained in the retail sector (with a view of that work also being less stressful in comparison). Concerns were also raised about the use of agency staff by LAs and the pay discrepancies between agency and permanent posts, alongside additional impacts on continuity and team stability. Perceived rationing of/limited resources for service users Struggles to provide adequate services to service users was a continual source of frustration in the face of current budgetary pressures. This could also be apposite to the personal ethics of working within the sector. Isolation/too much working from home The effects of hybrid working was viewed positively or negatively, depending upon the individual. Positives included the ability to concentrate more, better productivity with less interruptions and the inherent flexibility of choosing where and when an individual worked. Negatives included feelings of isolation and lack of support - a particular risk for new entrants. A lack of a team culture was also described in some cases. Additionally, management seemingly became more distant in some instances. Poor support and induction for newly qualified staff The induction process was viewed as being inconsistent across LAs. Providing initial support for new staff can be complicated by the effects of hybrid working, limiting support and team building opportunities for new entrants. Suggestions for improving consistency included mentoring, shadowing and standardising the structural induction process. Stress and COVID-19 burnout Stresses caused by working in the sector and lowered resilience over a prolonged period of time could contribute to burnout. Stress caused by the nature of the job was mentioned by a number of participants. COVID-19 and post pandemic effects contributing to stress were noted. This also impacted on staff working from home during and after this period. Stress was also caused by the ethical challenges of working within the constraints of the current social care system. Office environment/hot-desking issues As with hybrid working, both the pros and cons of attending the office were discussed by participants – with travel and parking costs described as factors which might influence office attendance. There was an acknowledgement that hub office space had been lost since the pandemic, which some thought had been detrimental. Both home and work environments had their supporters, depending on working preferences. For some, the office was preferred for providing deeper and broader opportunities for networking and helping to build a positive team culture. Open plan offices could be a problem due to their nature – be it issues of noise, a lack of privacy and storage space in some cases. Also a lack of locations to debrief or chat in private. Hot-desking could also prevent a team culture from developing. Next Steps Social Work England’s State of the Nation report (2023) suggested that high demand for health and care services, a rising complexity of needs and increases in vacancies continues to put pressure on a system that is already stretched. Workforce challenges around the recruitment and retention of staff alongside increased reliance on agency social workers constantly proves challenging for employers. Although social workers are adaptable and innovative in the ways they deliver social work, ultimately pressure in the system can undermine the stability of relationships which can have a direct bearing on people’s care (Social Work England, 2023). Similarly, Skills for Care (2021) concluded that a well-led, supported and developed ASC workforce were more likely to stay in post and deliver consistent, high quality, personalised care. Conversely, a workforce that was under-funded, under-developed, suffering from poor wellbeing and not supported to advocate for themselves and the people they cared for was likely to result in poor care or worse. Our research highlights that unless employers, and the government, recognise the current concerns of front-line practitioners, recruitment and retention will continue to be a challenge. Addressing these concerns, alongside wider consideration of career paths that may include the opportunity for research engagement for practitioners, is essential to stem the tide. Thanks to: The authors wish to thank all participants who took part in the online survey and gave up their time to be interviewed. This work was supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Wessex More information on our project: Professor Lee-Ann Fenge - lfenge@bournemouth.ac.uk Dr Andy Pulman – apulman@bournemouth.ac.uk https://nccdsw.co.uk/clusters/research/building-research-capacity-in-social-care https://www.arc-wx.nihr.ac.uk/research-areas-list/social-care%3A-local-authority-adult-social-care-recruitment-and-retention-research-project Further viewing: Pulman, A. 2024. NIHR ARC Wessex Social Care Lunchtime Seminar – Realities of adult social care recruitment and retention in 2023 References: Pulman, A. and Fenge, L. A. (2023) Building Capacity for Social Care Research - Individual-Level and Organisational Barriers Facing Practitioners. The British Journal of Social Work. bcad117). Skills for Care. (2021). Evidence review and sector consultation to inform Skills for Care strategy: Final sector report. Available from: https://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/resources/documents/Adult-social-care-workforce-data/Evidence-review-and-consultation-analysis.pdf (accessed February 22, 2024). Social Work England (2023) Social work in England: State of the nation 2023. Available from: https://www.socialworkengland.org.uk/about/publications/social-work-in-england-state-of-the-nation/ (accessed February 29, 2024). Previous Next

A qualitative case study to understand Young people’s food purchasing patterns in CONvenience stores in the school neighbourhood environment (Y-CON) Chief Investigators: Janis Baird and Christina Vogel, Professor of Public Health and Epidemiology and Adjunct Professor of Food Policy, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton Team: Dr Sarah Muir, Senior Research Fellow, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton Dr Kath Woods-Townsend, Principal Research Fellow, School of Healthcare, Enterprise and Innovation Dr Sarah Crozier, Senior Statistician, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton Dr Hayward Godwin, Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Southampton Professor Marcus Munafo and Dr Olivia Maynard, Bristol University Ravita Taheem, Southampton City Council, lead on childhood obesity Partners: Bristol University, University of Southampton, Southampton City Council Start: 1 October 2024 End: 31 March 2026 Background A poor diet significantly contributes to illnesses including heart disease, diabetes and stroke. One in three children are leaving primary school have obesity or overweight, raising concerns about their future health. The teenage years are crucial because this is when young people start making their own food choices, setting the stage for their lifelong eating habits. The Problem The journey to and from school often involves passing by convenience stores which rely on shoppers, such as young people, to impulse-buy products that are high in fat, salt and sugar. The presence of these stores in school neighbourhoods may be linked to the high rates of childhood obesity. Our Research Focus Our recent research, funded by NIHR ARC Wessex, looked at how supermarket product placement affects the shopping habits of mothers. Now, we aim to study how the placement of items in smaller convenience stores near schools influences the buying patterns of young people making their own dietary decisions. Study Design Our research is planned to run between October 2024 and March 2026. We will use one area in Chandler’s Ford, Hampshire, to understand what influences what young people's buy from convenience stores near their schools. We will invite around 40 students aged 11-16 years to participate in small focus groups. These groups will discuss their experiences and perceptions of using local convenience stores, including factors like convenience, travel, social influences, product placement, product choice, and promotions. Some students will also be employed as citizen scientists and will be trained to collect data from local stores and will be involved in analysis of findings and development of dissemination materials. Expected Outcomes Our findings will provide critical insights for shaping policies. They may help refine existing regulations on food placement and promotions, which currently exempt small businesses, potentially worsening health inequalities among young people. Engagement and Dissemination Results will be shared with the young participants in our study and the PPI panel through various media including infographics and we will involve them in wide dissemination to other groups of young people. Nationally, we will present our findings to the Department of Health and Social Care, Chartered Institute of Trading Standards, Impact for Urban Health, and the Association of Convenience Stores. Internationally, our research will be presented in scientific journals and at conferences.

ADOPTED: Mobility assessments in hospitalised older adults: study protocol for an e-survey of UK healthcare professionals PhD Candidate: Catherine Wharfe University of Portsmouth; Team: Maria Perissiou University of Portsmouth; Zoe Saynor University of Portsmouth; Jim Briggs University of Portsmouth; Carolina Gonçalves University of Portsmouth & University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust Start : 1/11/2023 Ends: 1/05/2025 Abstract Hospitalisation in acute care poses a significant risk of adverse outcomes in older adults, including loss of functional independence, disability, and death. Research carried out in hospitalised older adults suggests functional mobility tools or scales can predict adverse events and care needs in this population, which facilitates prompt escalation of care and discharge planning procedures. As such, a need to develop a standardised methodology for assessing or measuring mobility has been recognised. However, the degree to which standardised mobility tools are routinely used, how data is collected, and/or which clinical assessment processes are utilised in hospitals across the UK is currently lacking. The aim of this national survey is to identify the current practice of mobility assessment in older adults admitted to NHS Trusts and Private Health Organisations, with a view to informing further research on a standardised approach or best practice guidelines to assessing or measuring mobility in hospitalised older adults.

< Back Top banners Previous Next